HRreview Header

Just 30% of recruiters say they receive high-quality job applications, research finds

-

- Advertisment -

That’s according to new findings from hiring platform Totaljobs. The research shows that despite increasing competition for talent, many businesses remain reliant on manual methods and rigid screening criteria. Almost two-thirds (63%) of recruiters continue to manually review CVs, with 78 percent using them as the primary method of candidate evaluation.

High expectations may also be excluding qualified candidates. Nearly one in four (23%) recruiters reject applicants with unexplained employment gaps. Other key factors include favouring those with long tenure at previous jobs (30%) and experience at well-known organisations (28%). These trends suggest that potentially capable candidates may be filtered out based on outdated or overly narrow criteria.

Natalie Matalon, Chief People Officer at the Stepstone Group, commented, “There’s a clear disconnect between hiring expectations and the realities of the job market. While recruiters focus on finding the ‘perfect’ candidate, they may inadvertently overlook strong applicants due to rigid hiring criteria. Unexplained employment gaps, tenure requirements and experience at top-tier employers are often prioritised, yet these factors don’t always determine a candidate’s ability to excel in a role. Businesses need to shift towards a more inclusive and skills-focused approach to hiring, ensuring they aren’t narrowing the talent pool unnecessarily.”

AI usage on the rise

Artificial intelligence is playing a growing role in job applications, particularly among candidates. The report reveals that 67 percent of jobseekers now use AI tools to tailor applications, while 65 percent turn to AI to create or refine cover letters. This trend is changing how applications are reviewed and evaluated.

Recruiters acknowledge the impact of AI. A majority (82%) say AI has improved the professionalism of applications and 74 percent believe overall application quality has improved. However, the same proportion say AI-generated submissions feel less authentic, raising concerns about their reliability as indicators of genuine capability.

Matalon added, “AI is transforming the job application process, helping candidates refine their CVs and applications to appear more polished. However, while AI enhances presentation, it does not replace human judgment. Many recruiters believe AI-generated applications feel less authentic, which is why businesses must maintain a balance – leveraging AI for efficiency while ensuring human involvement in screening applicants to assess true potential.”

Rethinking recruitment processes

The research noted the need for employers to adapt their processes to attract the right talent. Almost half (48%) of recruiters say cover letters are becoming less relevant, and 26 percent of candidates report abandoning job applications that require one. This suggest that simplifying the process could help employers secure more high-quality candidates.

As candidates are asking for clearer communication, employers are encouraged to improve job descriptions by removing jargon, outlining essential and desirable qualifications, and providing transparency on pay and benefits.

The study also suggests that companies should make better use of applicant tracking systems (ATS) and smart matching tools to streamline hiring. Platforms that use structured criteria, keyword matching and pre-screening questions can support more efficient recruitment by filtering unsuitable applications earlier in the process.

Matalon said, “With hiring becoming increasingly competitive, businesses must rethink their approach to attracting and selecting candidates. Relying solely on traditional screening methods and stringent criteria could mean missing out on exceptional talent. By focusing on clear job descriptions, streamlined application processes, and a balanced integration of AI and human evaluation, businesses can improve application quality and ultimately secure the best hires.”

Latest news

Finance professionals ‘expect ESG and DEI focus to decline’

More than half of financial services professionals in the UK believe their company leaders will place less emphasis DEI over the next five years.

Crystel Robbins Rynne: Corporate pride – True LGBTQ+ allyship or meaningless rainbow-washing?

It’s Pride Month, and workplaces around the world are publicising their LGBTQ+ solidarity. Yet the multi-coloured flags get packed away as soon as July arrives.

Tribunal claims related to menopause triple in two years as caseload grows

Menopause-related claims have more than tripled over the past two years. There were 204 tribunal cases referencing menopause in 2024, compared with 64 in 2022.

UK workers ‘ready for AI’, but employer support lags behind

British employees are increasingly optimistic about AI in the workplace - but their employers are not keeping up with the hype.
- Advertisement -

Fiona McCoy, chief people officer at Lowe Rental

Lowe Rental’s chief people officer shares her routine, career journey and insights into HR’s evolving role in a fast-growing global business.

Exclusive: Burned out and falling behind: Why most leaders are struggling with distributed work

A major new report finds that just 19% of leaders are viewed as “very effective” at managing distributed work.

Must read

Matt Weston: An outlook for the HR trends to watch in 2021

"With the coronavirus pandemic continuing to impact businesses of all shapes and sizes, most companies are grappling with widespread changes to managing their workforces."

Social Media – the new diet pill?

  With any area of dissatisfaction there’s a natural human...
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you